← Back to Insights

Opening Motion for Research Review

Get notified when we publish new insights.

Narrated by Scarlett

In our second post, we asked whether self-directed, AI-powered software could ease some of musculoskeletal care's persistent gaps — the wait, the distance, the language — without adding to the provider's burden. We said we'd study it in the open. This is the next step: as of today, Motion is open for research review, and anyone can join.

A brief recap of why this is worth studying. 30–50% of patients don't adhere to prescribed rehabilitation. 78% leave care not fully understanding their instructions. Only 8% of limited-English patients receive discharge instructions in their preferred language. New-appointment waits average 31 days. And in rural states like Idaho, where we're based, 97.7% of counties are federally designated primary-care shortage areas. We suspect part of the problem is that the tools supporting providers and health systems haven't evolved quickly enough alongside modern care needs — so we began building one.

Every feature in Motion was built against one of those documented problems. Everything runs in five languages — English, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese, and Russian — because most limited-English patients never receive care in theirs. Instruction follows learning-science principles — a clean, consistent environment in every video — because comprehension is where care breaks down. Every voiceover specifies left and right, synced to clinically accurate 3D animation with multiple viewing angles, because adherence fails when people aren't confident they're doing it correctly. And a guided postural and movement assessment, led by Marissa, an AI-generated Personal Health Coach whose guidance is pre-recorded and deterministic, builds an exercise program from what it observes — for the weeks between appointments and the months after discharge, when guidance is hardest to reach.

If you're a healthcare professional — an individual provider, a health system, a self-insured employer, or a managed care organization — what we're studying is the mechanism, not the specific content. Everything in Motion is interchangeable and can be built from your own protocols. The aim is not replacing care; it's extending it into the patient's home without adding to your schedule. The review survey includes a track specifically for your professional evaluation.

We're not claiming Motion works. The assessment methods inside it have documented reliability limitations, and the assessment style and curated content are one example of what's possible — not a claim to the definitive methodology. As we wrote before: it's an instrument, not a finished product. The question sits beneath any particular method — whether self-directed guidance shaped around an individual's needs can make a meaningful difference.

Joining takes about two minutes. Download Motion on the App Store, create a free account, then tap Profile → “Redeem a code” and enter 3DMEDICAL. You'll have full access for 5 days — the assessment, every program, every feature. No payment, no card, nothing to cancel. Near the end we'll send one short survey; your honest take is the contribution.

Come at it however you like — as someone who might use it, or as someone deciding whether it belongs in your practice. What you notice is what we're after.

References

  1. Argent R, Daly A, Caulfield B. Patient involvement with home-based exercise programs. JMIR mHealth and uHealth (2018). PMC
  2. DeSai C, et al. Empowering patients: simplifying discharge instructions. BMJ Open Quality (2021). PMC (Original figure: Engel KG, et al. Ann Emerg Med, 2009. DOI)
  3. Karliner LS, et al. Evaluating the quality and equity of patient hospital discharge instructions. BMC Health Services Research (2025). PMC
  4. AMN Healthcare. 2025 Survey of Physician Appointment Wait Times. AMN
  5. Idaho Division of Public Health. Title V MCH Narrative: Overview of the State. MCHB/HRSA. HRSA
  6. Aragรณn-Vargas LF, et al. Validity and reliability of the new Basic Functional Assessment Protocol. IJERPH (2020). PMC
  7. Kollรถfrath AM, et al. Visual assessment of movement quality. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil (2021). PMC
  8. Post EG, et al. The reliability and discriminative ability of the overhead squat test. J Sport Rehabil (2017). PubMed

Get notified when we publish new insights.

We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe anytime.

← All posts